by Kathy Brown on April 5th, 2010 | 0 comments

What is it that keeps so-called "sex education" going in public schools?  Most parents have no idea what is actually taught to their children in this area.  It is often hidden inside fine sounding health classes and the obscurity of "counseling."  The message presented is quite toxic. 

(1)It begins with moral relativism.  There is no right or wrong, only what's right for each individual.   That is considered  "neutral" ethics and not offensive to anyone; except the narrow minded, out of touch adults who believe there is a moral "right" in matters of sex and the family.

(2)It is followed up by the insinuation that parents are old fashioned, unable to teach the real nitty gritty in sexual matters; thus, the school must step in.  Usually the directive to "wait until you are married to have sex" is not included; rather, the subjective goal is "wait until you are in love."  This is always good news for boys and an extra romantic incentive for girls. 

(3)The breakdown of modesty is an essential ingredient to the lessons in sex education.  This can begin as early as first grade.  Often the naming of body parts in mixed company is the entree to more discussion and an assault on the innocense of childhood.

(4)There is an assumption that no one can control themselves, much like their evolutionary ancestors, young people will have the urge to express themselves sexually, and that is fine as long as birth control is involved.  Despite the fact that uncommitted, immature partners are seldom very good at the practice, they are urged to try.  If that fails, there is a remedy.

(5)That solution is a quick trip to the abortion facility.  This is done in secret, to "protect" any children who may have been raped or who are the target of incest.  One wonders who that really protects.  This detail aside, the youngster is often screened to make sure they do not have a job and can qualify for "indigent woman" status.  Then, tax dollars can pay for the procedure.

(6)One of the consequences of public school's involvement in so-called sex education is the de-valuing of family.  This is done in several ways.  The broadening of the definition of "family" to include homosexual couples is one way this is done.  Breaking the link of  parental authority is another.  Completely disregarding the purpose and meaning of husband and wife intimacy further neutralizes this primary unit of society. 

Here's a picture of the Vicious Circle:

 

 

Next entry: Digging in the Dirt

Previous entry: Fact or Fable

Leave a comment

Basic HTML is allowed (a href, strong, em, blockquote).

back to Blog Archive